您的位置:考研教育网>  > 考研英语 > 复习指导 正文

2011考研英语预测及解析五

网络   2010-12-15 09:12 【 】【我要纠错

    Text 2 At the start of the year, The Independent on Sunday argued that there were three over-whelming reasons why Iraq should not be invaded: there was no proof that Saddam posed an imminent threat; Iraq would be even more unstable as a result of its liberation; and a conflict would increase the threat posed by terrorists. What we did not know was that Tony Blair had received intelligence and advice that raised the very same points. Last week‘s report from the Intelligence and Security Committee included the revelation that some of the intelligence had warned that a war against Iraq risked an increased threat of terrorism. Why did Mr. Blair not make this evidence available to the public in the way that so much of the alarmist intelligence on Saddam’s weapons was published? Why did he choose to ignore the intelligence and argue instead that the war was necessary, precisely because of the threat posed by international terrorism?

  There have been two parliamentary investigations into this war and the Hutton inquiry reopens tomorrow. In their different ways they have been illuminating, but none of them has addressed the main issues relating to the war. The Foreign Affairs Committee had the scope to range widely, but chose to become entangled in the dispute between the Government and the BBC. The Intelligence Committee reached the conclusion that the Government‘s file on Saddam’s weapons was not mixed up, but failed to explain why the intelligence was so hopelessly wrong. The Hutton inquiry is investigating the death of Dr. David Kelly, a personal tragedy of marginal relevance to the war against Iraq. Tony Blair has still to come under close examination about his conduct in the building-up to war. Instead, the Defence Secretary, Geoff Hoon, is being fingered as if he were master-minding the war behind everyone‘s backs from the Ministry of Defence. Mr. Hoon is not a minister who dares to think without consulting Downing Street first. At all times he would have been dancing to Downing Street’s tunes. Mr. Blair would be wrong to assume that he can draw a line under all of this by making Mr. Hoon the fall-guy. It was Mr. Blair who decided to take Britain to war, and a Cabinet of largely skeptical ministers that backed him. It was Mr. Blair who told MPs that unless Saddam was removed, terrorists would pose a greater global threat—even though he had received intelligence that suggested a war would lead to an increase in terrorism. Parliament should be the forum in which the Prime Minister is called more fully to account, but Iain Duncan Smith‘s support for the war has neutered an already inept opposition. In the absence of proper parliamentary scrutiny, it is left to newspapers like this one to keep asking the most important questions until the Prime Minister answers them.

  1. We learn from the first two paragraphs that _____.

  [A] the evidence should have been made available to the Parliament

  [B] the necessity of war has been exaggerated by the Committee

  [C] Blair had purposely ignored some of the intelligence he received

  [D] it was The Independent that first revealed the intelligence

  2. The author thinks that the Hutton enquiry is _____.

  [A] also beside the mark [B] hopelessly wrong

  [C] illuminating in its way [D] wide in scope

  3. By “chose to become entangled” (Line 4,Paragraph 3), the author implies that _____.

  [A] the dispute between the Government and the BBC was unnecessary

  [B] the Foreign Affairs Committee had mixed up the argument

  [C] it was entirely wrong to carry out such investigations

  [D] the Intelligence Committee shouldn‘t mix up with the affair

  4. It can be learned from Paragraph 4 that _____.

  [A] most ministers were suspicious of Hoon‘s conduct

  [B] Hoon will not do anything without consulting Blair

  [C] Blair should not divert his responsibility to his Cabinet

  [D] MPs think that it is Blair who drags the country into the war 5. What is the author‘s attitude towards the Parliament?

  [A] Indignant. [B] Skeptical. [C] Inquisitive. [D] Critical.

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

◇ 编辑推荐
·2019年医学硕士辅导
·2018年考研大纲汇总
·2019考研公共课网上辅导课程
·2019考研管理类联考网上辅导热招!!
·2019考研英语全程班620元
·2019考研政治全程班580元
 考研教育网官方微信

微信公众账号cnedu_cn

 网上辅导课程特色
  • 即报即学
  • 名师团队
  • 反复看课
  • 在线答疑
  • 移动教学
  • 讲义下载
  • 课后练习
  • 模拟测试
 24小时报名咨询

辅导课程

特色班精品班实验班
方案价格购买方案价格购买方案价格购买
    考研政治 方案 580元  购买 方案 1500元  购买 方案 3500元  购买
    考研英语 方案 620元  购买 方案 1500元  购买 方案 3500元  购买
    考研数学 方案 620元  购买 方案 1500元  购买 方案 3500元  购买

医学硕士

基础班强化班冲刺班全程班
方案价格购买 方案价格购买方案价格购买方案价格购买
    中医综合 方案 420元  购买 方案 360元  购买 方案 300元  购买 方案 880元  购买
    西医综合 方案 420元  购买 方案 360元  购买 方案 300元  购买 方案 880元  购买

管理类联考

基础班强化班冲刺班全程班
方案价格购买 方案价格购买方案价格购买方案价格购买
    管理类联考 方案 1600元  购买 方案 1600元  购买 方案 1200元  购买 方案 4500元  购买
    英语二 方案 900元  购买 方案 800元  购买 方案 800元  购买 方案 2700元  购买
    两科联报 管综+英语二(比单报 优惠1400元) 方案 5800元  购买