您的位置:考研教育网>  > 考研英语 > 复习指导 正文

2011考研英语预测及解析五

网络   2010-12-15 09:12 【 】【我要纠错

    Text 2 At the start of the year, The Independent on Sunday argued that there were three over-whelming reasons why Iraq should not be invaded: there was no proof that Saddam posed an imminent threat; Iraq would be even more unstable as a result of its liberation; and a conflict would increase the threat posed by terrorists. What we did not know was that Tony Blair had received intelligence and advice that raised the very same points. Last week‘s report from the Intelligence and Security Committee included the revelation that some of the intelligence had warned that a war against Iraq risked an increased threat of terrorism. Why did Mr. Blair not make this evidence available to the public in the way that so much of the alarmist intelligence on Saddam’s weapons was published? Why did he choose to ignore the intelligence and argue instead that the war was necessary, precisely because of the threat posed by international terrorism?

  There have been two parliamentary investigations into this war and the Hutton inquiry reopens tomorrow. In their different ways they have been illuminating, but none of them has addressed the main issues relating to the war. The Foreign Affairs Committee had the scope to range widely, but chose to become entangled in the dispute between the Government and the BBC. The Intelligence Committee reached the conclusion that the Government‘s file on Saddam’s weapons was not mixed up, but failed to explain why the intelligence was so hopelessly wrong. The Hutton inquiry is investigating the death of Dr. David Kelly, a personal tragedy of marginal relevance to the war against Iraq. Tony Blair has still to come under close examination about his conduct in the building-up to war. Instead, the Defence Secretary, Geoff Hoon, is being fingered as if he were master-minding the war behind everyone‘s backs from the Ministry of Defence. Mr. Hoon is not a minister who dares to think without consulting Downing Street first. At all times he would have been dancing to Downing Street’s tunes. Mr. Blair would be wrong to assume that he can draw a line under all of this by making Mr. Hoon the fall-guy. It was Mr. Blair who decided to take Britain to war, and a Cabinet of largely skeptical ministers that backed him. It was Mr. Blair who told MPs that unless Saddam was removed, terrorists would pose a greater global threat—even though he had received intelligence that suggested a war would lead to an increase in terrorism. Parliament should be the forum in which the Prime Minister is called more fully to account, but Iain Duncan Smith‘s support for the war has neutered an already inept opposition. In the absence of proper parliamentary scrutiny, it is left to newspapers like this one to keep asking the most important questions until the Prime Minister answers them.

  1. We learn from the first two paragraphs that _____.

  [A] the evidence should have been made available to the Parliament

  [B] the necessity of war has been exaggerated by the Committee

  [C] Blair had purposely ignored some of the intelligence he received

  [D] it was The Independent that first revealed the intelligence

  2. The author thinks that the Hutton enquiry is _____.

  [A] also beside the mark [B] hopelessly wrong

  [C] illuminating in its way [D] wide in scope

  3. By “chose to become entangled” (Line 4,Paragraph 3), the author implies that _____.

  [A] the dispute between the Government and the BBC was unnecessary

  [B] the Foreign Affairs Committee had mixed up the argument

  [C] it was entirely wrong to carry out such investigations

  [D] the Intelligence Committee shouldn‘t mix up with the affair

  4. It can be learned from Paragraph 4 that _____.

  [A] most ministers were suspicious of Hoon‘s conduct

  [B] Hoon will not do anything without consulting Blair

  [C] Blair should not divert his responsibility to his Cabinet

  [D] MPs think that it is Blair who drags the country into the war 5. What is the author‘s attitude towards the Parliament?

  [A] Indignant. [B] Skeptical. [C] Inquisitive. [D] Critical.

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

◇ 编辑推荐
·2020年医学硕士辅导
·2019年考研真题解析
·2020考研公共课网上辅导课程
·2020考研管理类联考网上辅导热招!!
·2020考研英语全程班620元
·2020考研政治全程班580元
 考研教育网官方微信

微信公众账号cnedu_cn

 网上辅导课程特色
  • 即报即学
  • 名师团队
  • 反复看课
  • 在线答疑
  • 移动教学
  • 讲义下载
  • 课后练习
  • 模拟测试
 24小时报名咨询
辅导课程
辅导体系 授课教师 招生方案 课时 价格 购买
考研政治
导学、基础、强化、冲刺、点题班赠19年导学、基础班 米 鹏 方案 109 580元 购买
考研英语
导学、基础、强化、冲刺、点题班赠19全程班 夏徛荣 方案 159 620元 购买
考研数学一
包含基础、强化、冲刺 赠19年特色班课程 李永乐团队 方案 210 919元 购买
考研数学二
包含基础、强化、冲刺 赠19年特色班课程 李永乐团队 方案 210 739元 购买
考研数学三
包含基础、强化、冲刺 赠19年特色班课程 李永乐团队 方案 210 919元 购买

医学硕士

基础班强化班冲刺班全程班
方案价格购买 方案价格购买方案价格购买方案价格购买
中医综合
方案 420元 购买 方案 360元 购买 方案 300元 购买 方案 880元 购买
西医综合
方案 420元 购买 方案 360元 购买 方案 300元 购买 方案 880元 购买
辅导课程
辅导体系 授课教师 招生方案 课时 价格 购买
英语二
含导学、基础、强化、冲刺班 乔老师 方案 108 1600元 购买
数学(全程班)
含导学、基础、强化、真题、冲刺班 官老师 方案 120 1600元 购买
逻辑(全程班)
导学、基础、强化、冲刺 真题班 丁老师 方案 120 1600元 购买
写作(全程班)
含导学、基础、强化、冲刺班 胡元奎 方案 30 1200元 购买
管综(全程班)
含数学、逻辑、写作三部分的基础、强化、冲刺班 名师团 方案 270 4500元 购买
管综+英语二
英语二全程班+管综全程班 比单报优惠600元 名师团 方案 386 5800元 购买